Jones v. Jones
24 Jones & S. 610
This text of 24 Jones & S. 610 (Jones v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jones v. Jones, 24 Jones & S. 610 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).
Opinion
The Court held (Per Curiam) “ that where averments in an answer are relevant to ‘the position taken by the defendants, either as a defence or by way of counter claim, they cannot be stricken out; that the correctness of defendant’s position cannot be determined on such motion and the matter stricken out if it be found incorrect; and that the order should be affirmed.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
24 Jones & S. 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-jones-nysuperctnyc-1889.