Jones v. Jones

24 Jones & S. 610
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided February 4, 1889·Published

Opinion

The Court held (Per Curiam) “ that where averments in an answer are relevant to ‘the position taken by the defendants, either as a defence or by way of counter claim, they cannot be stricken out; that the correctness of defendant’s position cannot be determined on such motion and the matter stricken out if it be found incorrect; and that the order should be affirmed.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Jones, 24 Jones & S. 610 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

24 Jones & S. 610 (Jones v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.