Jones v. Jones
This text of 27 N.Y.S. 274 (Jones v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Without passing upon the admissibility of the evidence which may be adduced under these interrogatories, we do not think that the 8th, 9th, 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th interrogatories are so clearly frivolous that the defendants should be de[276]*276prived of the opportunity of securing the testimony, that they may offer it at the trial, and, if excluded, have the benefit of an exception. We think, therefore, that the order appealed from should be reversed in respect to the 8th, 9th, 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th interrogatories, and the same should be allowed, without costs to either party upon this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 N.Y.S. 274, 75 Hun 35, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-jones-nysupct-1894.