Jones v. Jones

206 A.D. 774

This text of 206 A.D. 774 (Jones v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Jones, 206 A.D. 774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff payable out of the estate. The direction in the 19th clause of the will, to sell and convert the residue of the estate into cash and to divide the proceeds, was mandatory and worked an equitable conversion. No time having been fixed in the will for the conversion of the property into cash, such sale must be made within a reasonable time. What is a reasonable time depends upon the circumstances of each particular case. (Matter of Weston, 91 N. Y. 502; Walbridge v. Brooklyn Trust Co., 143 App. Div. 502.) The court - below has determined as a fact that a reasonable time to make such sale would be reached on January 1,1923, the testatrix having died in October, 1918. Upon the facts disclosed in the record, we see no reason for interfering with the judgment. Present — Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter, Etc., of Estate of Weston
91 N.Y. 502 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)
Walbridge v. Brooklyn Trust Co.
143 A.D. 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 A.D. 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-jones-nyappdiv-1923.