Jones v. . Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Jones v. . Jones

34 N.C. 98

DecidedJune 5, 1851

StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.C. 98 (Jones v. . Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. . Jones, 34 N.C. 98 (N.C. 1851).

Pincite

Opinion

For the reasons set forth in the case of Bagley v. Wood, ante, 90, without examining into the testimony upon which the Superior Court acted, which we have no power to do, the orders of said court are affirmed upon the ground that we have no power to revise a discretionary judgment of the Superior Court except for error in law. Here none is shown.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

(NOTE. — The same point decided at this term in the case ofLeavitt v. Etheridge, from Currituck.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

For the reasons set forth in the case of Bagley v. Wood, ante, 90, without examining into the testimony upon which the Superior Court acted, which we have no power to do, the orders of said court are affirmed upon the ground that we have no power to revise a discretionary judgment of the Superior Court except for error in law. Here none is shown.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

(NOTE. — The same point decided at this term in the case ofLeavitt v. Etheridge, from Currituck.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 N.C. 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-jones-nc-1851.