Jones v. Jones
This text of 320 S.W.3d 236 (Jones v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Randy E. Jones appeals from the trial court’s Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare the law, Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and is not an abuse of discretion, Slattery v. Slattery, 185 S.W.3d 692, 697-98 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We *237 affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2009).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 S.W.3d 236, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1223, 2010 WL 3552830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-jones-moctapp-2010.