Jones v. Jones

320 S.W.3d 236, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1223, 2010 WL 3552830
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 14, 2010·No. ED 94043·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randy E. Jones appeals from the trial court’s Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare the law, Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and is not an abuse of discretion, Slattery v. Slattery, 185 S.W.3d 692, 697-98 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We *237 affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Jones, 320 S.W.3d 236, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1223, 2010 WL 3552830 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

320 S.W.3d 236 (Jones v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shirley Jones v. Randy Jones and Cassandra A. Cordes-Patton
497 S.W.3d 334 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016)