Jones v. Jones

79 Miss. 261
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1901·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Whitfield, C. J,,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The case of Gordon v. Warfield, 74 Miss., 553 (21 So. Rep., 151), rests on the ground that the defendant therein was a nonresident, and no remedy existed by reason of such non-residence otherwise than as prayed in the bill therein. These parties are all residents of Washington county. It was never [266] within the contemplation of the statutes invoked by appellant to authorize chancery courts to take cognizance of a suit for unliquidated damages arising out of a tort, before there has been any judgment at law ascertaining the damages, the defendant being within the jurisdiction of the court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Jones, 79 Miss. 261 (Mich. 1901).

79 Miss. 261 (Jones v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gorchik v. Gorchik
663 S.W.2d 941 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1984)
Spitzer v. Barnhill
374 S.W.2d 811 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1964)
Allred v. Nesmith
149 So. 2d 29 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
Rankin v. Ford
134 So. 178 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1931)
Dowling v. Garner
70 So. 150 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)