Jones v. Jones

Indiana Supreme Court

Jones v. Jones

4 Blackf. 140, 1835 Ind. LEXIS 63

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 21, 1835

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Blackf. 140 (Jones v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Jones, 4 Blackf. 140, 1835 Ind. LEXIS 63 (Ind. 1835).

Pincite

Opinion

TROVER, Plea, not guilty; and verdict in favour of the pjajntiff for 33 dollars. New trial granted on the plaintiff’s motion. On the second trial, verdict and judgment in favour of the plaintiff for 1,750 dollars. The defendant sued out a writ of error; and the only error assigned was, that the new trial ought not to have been granted. '

The Court said that they must presume, a.s the contrary was not shown by the record, that,there was a sufficient ground for the new trial.

Judgment affirmed, with 3 per cent, damages and costs»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TROVER, Plea, not guilty; and verdict in favour of the pjajntiff for 33 dollars. New trial granted on the plaintiff’s motion. On the second trial, verdict and judgment in favour of the plaintiff for 1,750 dollars. The defendant sued out a writ of error; and the only error assigned was, that the new trial ought not to have been granted. '

The Court said that they must presume, a.s the contrary was not shown by the record, that,there was a sufficient ground for the new trial.

Judgment affirmed, with 3 per cent, damages and costs»

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Blackf. 140, 1835 Ind. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-jones-ind-1835.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack