Jones v. Jones

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jones v. Jones

90 So. 3d 991, 2012 WL 2401011, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10493

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 27, 2012·No. No. 4D11-4006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Marvin Jones appeals the trial court’s order denying his exceptions to a magistrate’s report, a non-final, non-appealable order. We therefore do not have appellate jurisdiction to review this order under direct appeal. See Murison v. Coral Park Props., Inc., 64 So.3d 1288, 1289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (“An order denying exceptions to a magistrate’s report is a non-final order and not directly appealable.”). We also conclude that the appellant is not entitled to relief were we to treat his appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c).

Dismissed.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Marvin Jones appeals the trial court’s order denying his exceptions to a magistrate’s report, a non-final, non-appealable order. We therefore do not have appellate jurisdiction to review this order under direct appeal. See Murison v. Coral Park Props., Inc., 64 So.3d 1288, 1289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (“An order denying exceptions to a magistrate’s report is a non-final order and not directly appealable.”). We also conclude that the appellant is not entitled to relief were we to treat his appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c).

Dismissed.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Jones v. Jones, 90 So. 3d 991, 2012 WL 2401011, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10493 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

90 So. 3d 991 (Jones v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related