Jones v. Jones

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jones v. Jones

752 So. 2d 1260, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2626, 2000 WL 266338

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 13, 2000

DocketNo. 1D99-1252

StatusPublished

This text of 752 So. 2d 1260 (Jones v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Jones, 752 So. 2d 1260, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2626, 2000 WL 266338 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which the parties’ marriage was dissolved, child custody and support were established, and marital property was distributed with an award of alimony to the appellee. The alimony award was not accompanied by the findings specified in section 61.08(1), Florida Statutes, and the order is deficient in this regard. See Swanston v. Swanston, 746 So.2d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); McCarty v. McCarty, 710 So.2d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Reynolds v. Reynolds, 668 So.2d 245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The order is therefore reversed as to the award of alimony, and the case is remanded. The trial court may reconsider the alimony award and the other financial awards to the extent appropriate on remand. See Todd v. Todd, 734 So.2d 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

BOOTH, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ„ CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which the parties’ marriage was dissolved, child custody and support were established, and marital property was distributed with an award of alimony to the appellee. The alimony award was not accompanied by the findings specified in section 61.08(1), Florida Statutes, and the order is deficient in this regard. See Swanston v. Swanston, 746 So.2d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); McCarty v. McCarty, 710 So.2d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Reynolds v. Reynolds, 668 So.2d 245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The order is therefore reversed as to the award of alimony, and the case is remanded. The trial court may reconsider the alimony award and the other financial awards to the extent appropriate on remand. See Todd v. Todd, 734 So.2d 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

BOOTH, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ„ CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

752 So. 2d 1260, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2626, 2000 WL 266338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-jones-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack