Jones v. Jones

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jones v. Jones

649 So. 2d 362, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 988, 1995 WL 49272

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 9, 1995

DocketNo. 93-4074

StatusPublished

This text of 649 So. 2d 362 (Jones v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Jones, 649 So. 2d 362, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 988, 1995 WL 49272 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal and cross appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. All of the issues raised involve the equitable distribution plan fashioned by the trial court. While the trial court valued and distributed all the assets, it is impossible to ascertain the trial court’s intent concerning the responsibility for the marital liabilities (especially the first and second mortgage on the marital residence).

We are also unable to determine which debts the trial court considered to be marital. Under these circumstances, we must reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings as to the plan of equitable distribution. Trusheim v. Trusheim, 643 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal and cross appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. All of the issues raised involve the equitable distribution plan fashioned by the trial court. While the trial court valued and distributed all the assets, it is impossible to ascertain the trial court’s intent concerning the responsibility for the marital liabilities (especially the first and second mortgage on the marital residence).

We are also unable to determine which debts the trial court considered to be marital. Under these circumstances, we must reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings as to the plan of equitable distribution. Trusheim v. Trusheim, 643 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

649 So. 2d 362, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 988, 1995 WL 49272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-jones-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack