Jones v. Jones
431 So. 2d 697, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20751
Opinion
The wife appeals several of the financial aspects and property distribution awards fashioned by the trial judge in the judgment which dissolved the brief marriage of the parties. We are required to review the judgment as a whole, and not the separate remedies used by the trial judge to achieve equity between the parties. Based on our review of the record we find that the trial judge did not abuse the broad discretion accorded trial judges by Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). Therefore, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Jones, 431 So. 2d 697, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20751 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
431 So. 2d 697 (Jones v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kaylor v. Kaylor
466 So. 2d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Langer v. Langer
463 So. 2d 265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)