Jones v. Jones

Supreme Court of Florida

Jones v. Jones

151 So. 706, 113 Fla. 360

DecidedDecember 23, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 151 So. 706 (Jones v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Jones, 151 So. 706, 113 Fla. 360 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Whereas it appears that an order of supersedeas was made and entered by a Justice of this Court on the 4th day of November, 1933, and that it was therein provided that the appeal in this case should operate as a supersedeas upon the appellant giving, or causing to be given, a bond, the amount and conditions of which to be fixed by an order of the circuit judge and executed in accordance with such conditions and approved in accordance with law, and

Whereas, it further appears that no bond has been filed in the office of the clerk of the circuit court in compliance with such order of supersedeas', and it further appearing from representations made by counsel for the appellee in open court at a hearing, at which counsel for appellant was present and participating, that the needs and faculties of the parties in equity and good conscience require that the said order of supersedeas should be vacated and the Court, having considered the record as now presented, is advised of its opinion and judgment to be given herein.

Whereupon, it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of supersedeas heretofore issued be, and the same is hereby vacated and annulled.

*361 So orderéd.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Whereas it appears that an order of supersedeas was made and entered by a Justice of this Court on the 4th day of November, 1933, and that it was therein provided that the appeal in this case should operate as a supersedeas upon the appellant giving, or causing to be given, a bond, the amount and conditions of which to be fixed by an order of the circuit judge and executed in accordance with such conditions and approved in accordance with law, and

Whereas, it further appears that no bond has been filed in the office of the clerk of the circuit court in compliance with such order of supersedeas', and it further appearing from representations made by counsel for the appellee in open court at a hearing, at which counsel for appellant was present and participating, that the needs and faculties of the parties in equity and good conscience require that the said order of supersedeas should be vacated and the Court, having considered the record as now presented, is advised of its opinion and judgment to be given herein.

Whereupon, it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of supersedeas heretofore issued be, and the same is hereby vacated and annulled.

*361 So orderéd.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 So. 706, 113 Fla. 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-jones-fla-1933.