Jones v. Jenkintown National Bank
13 A. 84, 10 Sadler 19, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 1038
Opinion
This case was properly submitted, and as the jury have found that the delay in notice and protest resulted from the agreement of the defendant, he has no ground to require a reversal of the judgment.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Jenkintown National Bank, 13 A. 84, 10 Sadler 19, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 1038 (Pa. 1888).
13 A. 84 (Jones v. Jenkintown National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Foley v. Emerald & Phœnix Brewing Co.
39 A. 650 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1898)