Jones v. Industrial Commission
This text of 404 P.2d 27 (Jones v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Review of a Commission decision that petitioner was too late under the limitations statute. 1 We agree with the Commission and affirm. No costs.
Petitioner was injured and was compensated intermittently. He was last attended by a doctor more than 3 years before his *29 present claim was filed. His contention is that his employer did not pay the doctor bill until after the three year period, and thus the statute was tolled. We disagree with this contention. The compensation was exhausted at the time of the last medical service, and the mere fact that the employer in this case, who incidentally had no previous knowledge of the medical charge, promptly paid it on notice, cannot, we hold, emasculate the obvious legislative intent of the statute. Otherwise, a doctor could withhold a balance due of $1.00 for years and thus render impotent the obvious import of the statute.
. Title 35-1-99, Utah Code Annotated 1953: “If no claim for compensation is filed with the industrial commission *29 within three years from the date of the accident or the date of the last payment of compensation, the right to compensation shall be wholly barred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
404 P.2d 27, 17 Utah 2d 28, 1965 Utah LEXIS 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-industrial-commission-utah-1965.