Jones v. Howell
This text of 107 S.W.2d 661 (Jones v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
R. D. Howell (appellee) sued F. D. Jones (appellant) to recover a brokerage commission. The case was correctly submitted on special issues, no objection being urged thereto; the evidence as to the existence, whether or not, of the brokerage contract sued upon was sharply conflicting; the jury could with equal propriety have decided the issue either for appellee or appellant, however, having resolved the conflicts in favor of appellee, and the trial court having approved same and rendered judgment thereon, we would not be justified in disturbing this status.
After a careful consideration of all assignments urged for reversal, and failing to find reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 S.W.2d 661, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-howell-texapp-1937.