Jones v. Howell

107 S.W.2d 661, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 712
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 29, 1937·No. No. 12233.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LOONEY, Justice.

R. D. Howell (appellee) sued F. D. Jones (appellant) to recover a brokerage commission. The case was correctly submitted on special issues, no objection being urged thereto; the evidence as to the existence, whether or not, of the brokerage contract sued upon was sharply conflicting; the jury could with equal propriety have decided the issue either for appellee or appellant, however, having resolved the conflicts in favor of appellee, and the trial court having approved same and rendered judgment thereon, we would not be justified in disturbing this status.

After a careful consideration of all assignments urged for reversal, and failing to find reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Howell, 107 S.W.2d 661, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 712 (Tex. Ct. App. 1937).

107 S.W.2d 661 (Jones v. Howell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Highway Ins. Underwriters v. Spradlin
190 S.W.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1945)