Jones v. Howard
22 S.E. 291, 96 Ga. 752
Opinion
The registry act of October 1st, 1889, does'not contemplate or require that a distress warrant for rent shall be entered upon the general execution docket provided for by section 2 of that act. As the judge below who tried the case without a jury entertained a contrary view, and therefore necessarily rendered a judgment in favor of the prevailing party, irrespective of the disputed question of fact involved, there should be a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Howard, 22 S.E. 291, 96 Ga. 752 (Ga. 1895).
22 S.E. 291 (Jones v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Corley-Powell Produce Co. v. Allen
157 S.E. 251 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Butler v. LaGrange Grocery Co.
116 S.E. 213 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)