Jones v. Hiltscher

251 U.S. 545, 40 S. Ct. 218, 64 L. Ed. 407, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1082
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 26, 1920
DocketNo. 181
StatusPublished

This text of 251 U.S. 545 (Jones v. Hiltscher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Hiltscher, 251 U.S. 545, 40 S. Ct. 218, 64 L. Ed. 407, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1082 (1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726. Mr. W. Martin Jones, Jr., with whom Mr. Harry P. Owen was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edward D. Tittmann and Mr., Charles T. Tittmann, for defendant in error, submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 U.S. 545, 40 S. Ct. 218, 64 L. Ed. 407, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-hiltscher-scotus-1920.