Jones v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Jones v. Hill

152 P.3d 961, 210 Or. App. 751, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 215

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 7, 2007·No. CV020554; A123608·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying post-conviction relief. He assigns error to (1) the post-conviction court’s rejection of his claims predicated on Crawford v. Washington, 541 US 36, 124 S Ct 1354, 158 L Ed 2d 177 (2004), and (2) the court’s denial of leave to file an amended petition. Petitioner’s first assignment of error is controlled by Peed v. Hill, 210 Or App 704, 153 P3d 125 (2007). With respect to petitioner’s second assignment of error, we determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying post-conviction relief. He assigns error to (1) the post-conviction court’s rejection of his claims predicated on Crawford v. Washington, 541 US 36, 124 S Ct 1354, 158 L Ed 2d 177 (2004), and (2) the court’s denial of leave to file an amended petition. Petitioner’s first assignment of error is controlled by Peed v. Hill, 210 Or App 704, 153 P3d 125 (2007). With respect to petitioner’s second assignment of error, we determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend.

Affirmed.

Jones v. Hill, 152 P.3d 961, 210 Or. App. 751, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 215 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

152 P.3d 961 (Jones v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related