Jones v. Hershberger

Fourth Circuit

Jones v. Hershberger

516 F. App'x 285

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 2, 2013·No. No. 12-8115·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dante A. Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea[286] sons stated by the district court. Jones v. Hershberger, No. 1:12-cv-00702-ELH, 2012 WL 6185637 (D.Md. Dec. 10, 2012). We deny Jones’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dante A. Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea[286] sons stated by the district court. Jones v. Hershberger, No. 1:12-cv-00702-ELH, 2012 WL 6185637 (D.Md. Dec. 10, 2012). We deny Jones’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jones v. Hershberger, 516 F. App'x 285 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

516 F. App'x 285 (Jones v. Hershberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related