Jones v. Hawkinson Van Lines

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jones v. Hawkinson Van Lines

867 S.W.2d 593, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1666, 1993 WL 429212

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 26, 1993·No. No. 64043·Published

Opinion

ORDER ■

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Paula M. Jones, appeals from a judgment rendered by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, as well as the transcript and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER ■

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Paula M. Jones, appeals from a judgment rendered by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, as well as the transcript and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Jones v. Hawkinson Van Lines, 867 S.W.2d 593, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1666, 1993 WL 429212 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

867 S.W.2d 593 (Jones v. Hawkinson Van Lines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.