Jones v. Harmon
8 Ohio Law. Abs. 321
Opinion
[322]*322Marshall, CJ., Kinkade, Robinson and Matthias, JJ., concur. Jones and Day, JJ., concur in the syllabus but not in the judgment, since they do not agree with the law pronounced in Heidle v. Baldwin, 118 Ohio St., 375.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Harmon, 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 321 (Ohio Ct. App. 1930).
8 Ohio Law. Abs. 321 (Jones v. Harmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heidle v. Baldwin
161 N.E. 44 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1928)