Jones v. Freeman

72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39567, 1995 WL 747253
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 15, 1995
Docket95-7392
StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 127 (Jones v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Freeman, 72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39567, 1995 WL 747253 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert E. Lee JONES, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Franklin E. FREEMAN, Jr.; Doris Jones; Attorney General of
North Carolina; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia; Attorney General of West Virginia; Federal
Correctional Institution, Butner, NC; the United States
Attorney General, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 95-7392.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 1995
Decided: December 15, 1995

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-484-5-HC-F)

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. Secs. 2241, 2254 (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Freeman, No. CA-95-484-5-HC-F (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39567, 1995 WL 747253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-freeman-ca4-1995.