Jones v. . Fortune and Another

69 N.C. 322
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 N.C. 322 (Jones v. . Fortune and Another) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. . Fortune and Another, 69 N.C. 322 (N.C. 1873).

Opinion

Reade, J.

The Act 1869-'70, ch. 193 requires defendant in “suits for the recovery of real property or the possession thereof,” to give bond for $200 with surety to answer for costs and damages, &c., before he shall be permitted to plead, answer or demur. But there is a proviso in sec. 4 of said Act that if an attorney will certify that plaintiff is not entitled to recover, and the defendant- will- swear that he is unable to give security, then the defendant may plead, &c., without bond.

In this case there was the necessary certificate of counsel and affidavit of defendant, but still his Plonor refused to allow the defendant to plead, &c., without bond. In this we *324 think there was error. When the necessary certificate and oath are made, the language of the Act is “no defendant shall be required to give said bond,” &c. Deal v. Palmer, 68 N. C. Rep. 215.

Error.

Per Curiam. Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dempsey v. . Rhodes
93 N.C. 120 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885)
Taylor v. . Apple
90 N.C. 343 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 N.C. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-fortune-and-another-nc-1873.