Jones v. Foote

137 Mass. 543, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 309
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 5, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 137 Mass. 543 (Jones v. Foote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Foote, 137 Mass. 543, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 309 (Mass. 1884).

Opinion

W. Allen, J.

The question presented is whether, under the fifth clause of the will, the two youngest children take equally, or whether the executor is to apply the property to the maintenance and education of both or either one of them at his discretion.

[545]*545We think that the clause constitutes a legacy to the two children in trust, and that they take equal interests under it. It is not a bequest to the head of a family for the support of his family, or to a trustee for the support of the family of the testator; but it is a legacy by a father for the maintenance and education of two of his children by name. We think this gives to them equal rights in the estate. The insertion of the words “ the maintenance and education of ” restricts the use they may have of the property, but cannot deprive them of the equal right to such use.

As the will gives to each of the children an equal right with the other, the fact that one of them has acquired other means of maintenance and education is immaterial; and the acquisition of new parents, by adoption, by one or both of the children, will not determine the interest given by the will to both. The testator might have given to the .trustee discretion to apply the fund according to the different needs of the beneficiaries, but he has not done so, and the trustee has no authority to take from Grace C. the proportion belonging to her, and bestow it upon her brother. Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Johnson
96 N.E.2d 155 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1951)
Gates v. Pond
12 Ohio C.C. 59 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1896)
Tutorship of Crane
17 So. 431 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1895)
Jackman v. Nelson
17 N.E. 529 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 Mass. 543, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-foote-mass-1884.