Jones v. Ferguson

979 So. 2d 1245, 2008 WL 1883652
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 2008
Docket4D07-1865
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 979 So. 2d 1245 (Jones v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Ferguson, 979 So. 2d 1245, 2008 WL 1883652 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

979 So.2d 1245 (2008)

Lawrence Lee JONES, Appellant,
v.
T. FERGUSON, Food Service Director of Glades Correctional Institution, individually and in his official capacity, Appellee.

No. 4D07-1865.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 2008.

Lawrence Lee Jones, Belle Glade, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Lee Jones appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his complaint pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2007). The order found insufficient legal grounds for Jones's cause of action and directed the Clerk of Court not to file the case. We hold that it was error to dismiss the case without first finding Jones indigent. See Craft v. Holloway, 975 So.2d 620 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (finding the trial court's dismissal of the appellant's complaint under section 57.085 was premature because he had not yet been adjudicated indigent as required by section 57.085(6)).

We do not reach the issue of whether Jones's petition stated a cause of action. Upon remand, if the trial court adjudicates Jones indigent and again dismisses his claim because it is legally insufficient, we recommend that the trial court state its reasons for dismissal. See Drayton v. Moore, 807 So.2d 819, 823 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (recommending that if a trial court finds indigency on remand, and again dismisses *1246 the claim, it should "detail the deficiencies in the petition that justify dismissal").

We affirm without discussion Jones's claim that the trial court erred in not retaining all of the original pleadings necessary to effectuate appellate review.

Affirmed in Part; Reversed in Part.

SHAHOOD, C.J., TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Joseph
989 So. 2d 744 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
979 So. 2d 1245, 2008 WL 1883652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-ferguson-fladistctapp-2008.