Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided January 30, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2011-1260·Published

Opinion

uNITEi) sTATEs DISTRICT CoURT F 1 |_ E D FoR THE i)isTRiCT oF CoLUMBIA

JAN 3 0 2012

g

Plaintiff, ) v. § Civil Action No. l l-l26O (UNA)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., §

Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court provisionally permitted the above-captioned action to be filed on July 12,

201 l. At that time, the Court directed plaintiff to submit a certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. § l9l5. Plaintiff since has submitted two documents, neither of which is the trust fund account

statement. The Court will dismiss this action without prejudice An Order is issued separately.

A¢l/

DATE; //L/)/)?/ U was si)isrri¢ciudg@

M~»~,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, (D.D.C. 2012).

Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.