Jones v. Elmore
This text of 729 N.W.2d 525 (Jones v. Elmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tommy JONES and Joann Jones, Plaintiffs,
v.
James Timothy ELMORE, David La Douceur, and James Brother's Landscape & Pond Supply, Inc., Defendants, Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Power Play Custom Trailers and Stephen Sassek, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant leave to appeal to further consider the relationship under MCR 2.603(D)(1) between the "good cause" and the "meritorious defense" standards for setting aside a default judgment, and to review the application of these standards in the instant case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
729 N.W.2d 525, 477 Mich. 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-elmore-mich-2007.