Jones v. Elliott

35 Me. 137
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1853·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hathaway, J.

—■ A justice of the peace, in issuing an execution on a judgment rendered by him, acts ministerially, not judicially, and his power to renew executions is continued for the term of two years after his judicial power under his commission expires. R. S. c. 116, $ 28.

In the case at bar the execution was a pluries, issued by the justice within two years after he had been appointed jailer.

It is therefore immaterial whether the offices of justice of the peace and jailer are incompatible or not. The justice had authority to renew the execution, either by virtue of his commission or the statute.

As agreed by the parties a default must be entered.

Shepley, C. J., and Wells and Howard, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Elliott, 35 Me. 137 (Me. 1853).

35 Me. 137 (Jones v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Casner
44 P. 752 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1896)