Jones v. Elliott

35 Me. 137
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 Me. 137 (Jones v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Elliott, 35 Me. 137 (Me. 1853).

Opinion

Hathaway, J.

—■ A justice of the peace, in issuing an execution on a judgment rendered by him, acts ministerially, not judicially, and his power to renew executions is continued for the term of two years after his judicial power under his commission expires. R. S. c. 116, $ 28.

In the case at bar the execution was a pluries, issued by the justice within two years after he had been appointed jailer.

It is therefore immaterial whether the offices of justice of the peace and jailer are incompatible or not. The justice had authority to renew the execution, either by virtue of his commission or the statute.

As agreed by the parties a default must be entered.

Shepley, C. J., and Wells and Howard, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Casner
44 P. 752 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Me. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-elliott-me-1853.