Jones v. Easton
This text of 11 Abb. N. Cas. 114 (Jones v. Easton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The lien of the attorney upon his client’s cause of action attaches to a verdict, report, decision or judgment in his client’s favor (Code Civ. Pro. § 66). I understand that section not to apply to a report upon a reference ordered under section 1015. The costs [115]*115upon such a reference are motion costs, and come within section 779, which says such costs may be set off against costs awarded to the adverse party. The plaintiff has obtained a judgment against the defendant for a large amount.. This judgment he shows he cannot collect. He should not be compelled to pay costs to the defendant which have been awarded against him on a motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Abb. N. Cas. 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-easton-nysuperctnyc-1882.