Jones v. Easton

11 Abb. N. Cas. 114
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided June 15, 1882·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Truax, J.

The lien of the attorney upon his client’s cause of action attaches to a verdict, report, decision or judgment in his client’s favor (Code Civ. Pro. § 66). I understand that section not to apply to a report upon a reference ordered under section 1015. The costs [115] upon such a reference are motion costs, and come within section 779, which says such costs may be set off against costs awarded to the adverse party. The plaintiff has obtained a judgment against the defendant for a large amount.. This judgment he shows he cannot collect. He should not be compelled to pay costs to the defendant which have been awarded against him on a motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Easton, 11 Abb. N. Cas. 114 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).

11 Abb. N. Cas. 114 (Jones v. Easton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Chenoweth
18 Abb. N. Cas. 20 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1886)