Jones v. Easley

53 Ga. 454
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1874·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

McCay, Judge.

1. The authority to sell under legal process depends upon the judgment and levy. These the purchaser is bound to see [456] are complete: Code, sec. 2628. A levy on land consists of the entry, signed by-the proper officer. That is the only seizure there is in this state: See Wilson vs. Ansley, 47 Georgia, 278. Tax fi. fas. under $50 00 must be levied by a constable (Code, section 888,) and returned to the sheriff. Was this levy mad,e by a constable? Who can say? The statute requires the levy to'loe signed : Code, sec. 3640. Had the party offering this deed offered toMiave this entry signed, shown.that the entry was in fact made by a proper officer, with intent to make a levy, and left unsigned by mistake, perhaps that might have cured the defect. The recital in the deed cannot help the matter. Such recitals are prima facie evidence of the acts of the officer other than such acts as enter into his authority to sell, such as the advertisement, place and hours of sale, etc., but the authority to sell stands on a different footing, and must be proven: 16 Georgia, 71.

2. The defendant was a clear trespasser, as the evidence shows he had no lawful right whatever, but was in possession by mere entry. In such cases the plaintiff may recover on his prior possession alone, and that the plaintiff clearly had: Code, sec. 3366.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Easley, 53 Ga. 454 (Ga. 1874).

53 Ga. 454 (Jones v. Easley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holden v. Lynn
1911 OK 503 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Vickers v. Hawkins
58 S.E. 44 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Wolfe v. Baxter
13 S.E. 18 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1891)
Bagley v. Kennedy
11 S.E. 1091 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1890)
Shaw v. Hill
44 N.W. 422 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1889)
Parker v. Waycross & Florida Railroad
8 S.E. 871 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1889)
New Mexico, R. G. & P. R. Co. v. Crouch
4 N.M. 141 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1887)
City of Atlanta v. Word
78 Ga. 276 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1886)
McArthur & Griffin v. Matthewson & Butler
67 Ga. 134 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1881)