Jones v. Duncan

Fourth Circuit

Jones v. Duncan

478 F. App'x 11

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 11, 2012·No. No. 12-1427·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney B. Jones appeals the district court’s order entering judgment for Defendant in this action raising various challenges in connection with disputed student loans. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Duncan, No. 8:11—cv-00158-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade[12] quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney B. Jones appeals the district court’s order entering judgment for Defendant in this action raising various challenges in connection with disputed student loans. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Duncan, No. 8:11—cv-00158-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade[12] quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jones v. Duncan, 478 F. App'x 11 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

478 F. App'x 11 (Jones v. Duncan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related