Jones v. Dole Food Co.

Fourth Circuit

Jones v. Dole Food Co.

473 F. App'x 270

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 30, 2012

DocketNo. 11-2309

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 473 F. App'x 270 (Jones v. Dole Food Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Dole Food Co., 473 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Arlester El Jones appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action. We [271]*271have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Dole Food Co., 827 F.Supp.2d 532 (W.D.N.C.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Arlester El Jones appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action. We [271]*271have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Dole Food Co., 827 F.Supp.2d 532 (W.D.N.C.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 F. App'x 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-dole-food-co-ca4-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack