Jones v. Doe

Supreme Court of Virginia

Jones v. Doe

6 Va. 105

DecidedFebruary 5, 1818

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Va. 105 (Jones v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Doe, 6 Va. 105 (Va. 1818).

Pincite

Opinion

The following was the opinion of this Court, pronounced by Judge ItOANn.

The appellant in this case having admitted that he could not gainsay the appellee's right to revive the ~judgment mentioned in the scirefacuzs, the Court is of opinion that there is no error in the said judginent;-at least, of which he can complain. Nor would the case be different, could we restrict the acknowledgment to apply to his own portion of the land merely. In that ease, the judgment, so far as it exceeded that portion, would not he injurious to him, nor could he complain of it.

Judgment affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following was the opinion of this Court, pronounced by Judge ItOANn.

The appellant in this case having admitted that he could not gainsay the appellee's right to revive the ~judgment mentioned in the scirefacuzs, the Court is of opinion that there is no error in the said judginent;-at least, of which he can complain. Nor would the case be different, could we restrict the acknowledgment to apply to his own portion of the land merely. In that ease, the judgment, so far as it exceeded that portion, would not he injurious to him, nor could he complain of it.

Judgment affirmed,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Va. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-doe-va-1818.