Jones v. Doan

Fourth Circuit

Jones v. Doan

330 F. App'x 32

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2009·No. No. 09-1223·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wyatt E. Jones appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Jones’ employment discrimination claim under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 to 797 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Doan, No. l:07-cv-00585-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Jan 30, 2009; entered Feb. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wyatt E. Jones appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Jones’ employment discrimination claim under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 to 797 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Doan, No. l:07-cv-00585-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Jan 30, 2009; entered Feb. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jones v. Doan, 330 F. App'x 32 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

330 F. App'x 32 (Jones v. Doan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related