Jones v. DirecTV, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Jones v. DirecTV, Inc.

448 F. App'x 29

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedNovember 22, 2011

DocketNo. 11-10887

StatusPublished

This text of 448 F. App'x 29 (Jones v. DirecTV, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. DirecTV, Inc., 448 F. App'x 29 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Andrea Jones appeals from the district court’s grant of a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause in her DirecTV service agreement.

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the judgment of the district court based upon AT & T Mobility v. Concepcion, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011), and Cappuccitti v. DirecTV, 623 F.3d 1118, 1126 (11th Cir.2010).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Andrea Jones appeals from the district court’s grant of a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause in her DirecTV service agreement.

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the judgment of the district court based upon AT & T Mobility v. Concepcion, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011), and Cappuccitti v. DirecTV, 623 F.3d 1118, 1126 (11th Cir.2010).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

448 F. App'x 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-directv-inc-ca11-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack