Jones v. Director of Arkansas Employment Security Department

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Jones v. Director of Arkansas Employment Security Department

965 S.W.2d 789, 61 Ark. App. 155, 1998 Ark. App. LEXIS 212

CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 25, 1998

DocketE 97-230

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 965 S.W.2d 789 (Jones v. Director of Arkansas Employment Security Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Director of Arkansas Employment Security Department, 965 S.W.2d 789, 61 Ark. App. 155, 1998 Ark. App. LEXIS 212 (Ark. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Director of the Employment Security Department has filed a Motion to Strike additional information filed by the appellant, Dorothy A. Jones, with her petition for review. However, there is no need to file such a motion in Employment Security cases; the decision of the Board of Review in this case was affirmed without opinion on March 18, 1998, pursuant to Rule 5-2(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, without consideration of the additional information submitted. This court does not consider additional evidence filed except as ordered by this court and directed to the Board of Review pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-529(c)(2)(A) (Repl. 1997). See also Fry v. Director of Labor, 16 Ark. App. 204, 698 S.W.2d 816 (1985).

In the future, the Director should be advised that a Motion to Strike for the reason set out above is cumulative and unnecessary.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The Director of the Employment Security Department has filed a Motion to Strike additional information filed by the appellant, Dorothy A. Jones, with her petition for review. However, there is no need to file such a motion in Employment Security cases; the decision of the Board of Review in this case was affirmed without opinion on March 18, 1998, pursuant to Rule 5-2(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, without consideration of the additional information submitted. This court does not consider additional evidence filed except as ordered by this court and directed to the Board of Review pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-10-529(c)(2)(A) (Repl. 1997). See also Fry v. Director of Labor, 16 Ark. App. 204, 698 S.W.2d 816 (1985).

In the future, the Director should be advised that a Motion to Strike for the reason set out above is cumulative and unnecessary.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

965 S.W.2d 789, 61 Ark. App. 155, 1998 Ark. App. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-director-of-arkansas-employment-security-department-arkctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack