Jones v. Derby

1 Abb. Pr. 458
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Abb. Pr. 458 (Jones v. Derby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Derby, 1 Abb. Pr. 458 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1855).

Opinion

Morris, J.

The evidence in this case shows that defendant’s residence and place of business was in the city of Hew York, and it was so known to the plaintiff at the time the summons was served at his place of residence, and that it was also known that defendant was then in California on business. The plaintiff’s affidavits, upon which the order to serve the summons was granted, shows all these facts.

The act entitled “ an act to facilitate the service of process in certain cases,” does not apply to the present case. In this [459]*459case there is no evidence that the defendant cannot be found, or if found, avoids or evades such service.”

This question is ably considered by Harris, Justice, in the case of Collins a. Campfield, (9 How. Pr. R., 519).

Judgment and execution set aside with costs, and ten dollars costs of this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ottman v. Daly
7 N.Y.S. 897 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Abb. Pr. 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-derby-nysupct-1855.