Jones v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Acupuncture
524 So. 2d 700, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 866, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1477, 1988 WL 31714
This text of 524 So. 2d 700 (Jones v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Acupuncture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jones v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Acupuncture, 524 So. 2d 700, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 866, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1477, 1988 WL 31714 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
Cf. Alvarez v. Department of Professional Regulation, 458 So.2d 808 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (if the instructions to a portion of the acupuncture examination are misleading and insufficient, the remedy is to allow those persons who failed the exam due to the misleading instructions to retake that portion of the examination).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Alvarez v. Department of Professional Regulation, Acupuncture
458 So. 2d 808 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
524 So. 2d 700, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 866, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1477, 1988 WL 31714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-department-of-professional-regulation-board-of-acupuncture-fladistctapp-1988.