Jones v. Department of Corrections

14 So. 3d 272, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10375, 2009 WL 2244476
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 2009·No. 1D09-1111·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding is hereby converted to an appeal of a final order pursuant to Green v. Moore, 111 So.2d 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Here the trial court denied Jones’ petition for habeas corpus without requiring a response. The trial court characterized the petition as “facially insufficient” because it did not allege exhaustion of administrative remedies. We have recently held such to be error in the context of a petition for habeas corpus where the affirmative defense of exhaus *273 tion has not been raised by a response to the petition. See Santana v. Henry, 12 So.3d 843 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Accordingly, we REVERSE the trial court’s order dismissing the petition for writ of ha-beas corpus and REMAND for further proceedings consistent -with this court’s opinion in Santana.

KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Department of Corrections, 14 So. 3d 272, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10375, 2009 WL 2244476 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

14 So. 3d 272 (Jones v. Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glover v. State
14 So. 3d 272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)