Jones v. Davis
This text of Jones v. Davis (Jones v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6849
NICHOLAS WARNER JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ARRIE W. DAVIS, Judge; ROBERT M. BELL, Chief Judge; BALTIMORE CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 03-3526-1)
Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 2, 2005
Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicholas Warner Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Nicholas Warner Jones appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of an order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Davis, No.
CA-03-3526-1 (D. Md. filed Feb. 24, 2004; entered Fed. 25, 2004).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jones v. Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-davis-ca4-2005.