Jones v. Davis

777 S.W.2d 582, 300 Ark. 130, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 438
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 9, 1989
Docket89-120
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 777 S.W.2d 582 (Jones v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Davis, 777 S.W.2d 582, 300 Ark. 130, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 438 (Ark. 1989).

Opinions

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is a personal injury case. The only question is whether a stepfather is liable for his minor stepson’s negligence in driving a vehicle. The trial judge granted summary judgment on this question holding in favor of the stepfather. We affirm.

Mark Jones, the appellant, was riding a motorcycle when he was struck by a vehicle driven by Charles A. Volpert who was seventeen years old. Volpert’s mother, Barbara Davis, signed his application for a driver’s license, and the car was registered in her name. She is married to Charles E. Davis, the appellee. Volpert’s father is living in Pulaski County and contributes $250 per month for his son’s support. Neither Volpert’s father nor his stepfather, Davis, signed the application.

The appellants contend Charles E. Davis stood in loco parentis or in place of a parent, and was required to sign Volpert’s application for a driver’s license and is therefore liable for his stepson’s negligence. Ark. Code Ann. § 27-16-702(a)(l) (Supp. 1987) provides:

The original application of any person under the age of eighteen (18) years for an instruction permit, operator’s license, or motordriven cycle or motorcyle license shall be signed and verified before a person authorized to administer oaths by either the father or mother of the applicant, if either is living or has custody. In the event neither parent is living, then the application shall be signed by the person or guardian having custody or by an employer of the minor. In the event there is no guardian or employer, then the application shall be signed by any other responsible person who is willing to assume the obligations imposed under this subchapter upon a person signing the application of a minor.

The language in the statute clearly requires that either parent, if living, sign a minor’s application for a driver’s license. Only if neither parent is living is anyone else authorized to sign the application. Volpert’s mother and father were living at the time he applied for his license. Therefore Volpert’s stepfather was not required or authorized to sign the application and cannot be held liable under Ark. Code Ann. § 27-16-702(c)(1) (Supp. 1987).

Words in a statute must be given their usual and ordinary meaning. If there is no ambiguity, the statute is given effect just as it reads. Chandler v. Perry-Casa Public Schools, Dist. No. 2, 286 Ark. 170, 690 S.W.2d 349 (1985). There was no genuine issue of material fact, and the trial judge correctly granted summary judgment. See Scully v. Middleton, 295 Ark. 603, 751 S.W.2d 5 (1988).

Affirmed.

Glaze, J., not participating. 779 S.W.2d 181 James C. Baker, Jr., for appellant. Jacob Sharp, Jr., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Houchin
144 S.W.3d 764 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2004)
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston v. Hohman
6 S.W.3d 767 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Paragould Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Paragould
809 S.W.2d 688 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1991)
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 1990

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
777 S.W.2d 582, 300 Ark. 130, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-davis-ark-1989.