Jones v. Darden

90 Ala. 372
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1890·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

The complaint seems to us to be sufficient, and not liable to the supposed defects suggested by the demurrer of the defendant. The defendant would be liable to the owner of the mare, not only for any injury resulting from the viciousnpss of the stallion, known to his owner, which was the proximate consequence of the service undertaken, but also for any injury resulting from a want of ordinary care or lack of skill on the part of the defendant, or his agent; or, in other words, any negligence on their part, in managing and controlling the stallion in the process of the service. The fact of negligence was charged in such form as that a material issue, in law or fact, could be taken thereon by the adverse party, and this is all the statute requires. — Code, 1886, § 2664; M. & M. R. R. Co. v. Crenshaw, 65 Ala. 566; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Jones, 83 Ala. 376; S. & N. Ala. R. R. Co. v. Thompson, 62 Ala. 494.

The demurrer to the complaint was properly overruled, and 'the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Darden, 90 Ala. 372 (Ala. 1890).

90 Ala. 372 (Jones v. Darden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stark v. Bredahl
269 N.W. 206 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1936)
Howard v. McCarson
110 So. 296 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Strickland v. Jackson
87 So. 576 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)
Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. Martin
117 Ala. 367 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1897)