Jones v. Darby

170 S.E. 790, 177 Ga. 625, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 374
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 14, 1933
DocketNo. 9235
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 170 S.E. 790 (Jones v. Darby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Darby, 170 S.E. 790, 177 Ga. 625, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 374 (Ga. 1933).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

A motion was made to dismiss the writ of error, on the ground that, since the decision complained of, the question involved in the case has become moot because of certain alleged occurrences rendering a decision unnecessary. The plaintiffs in error, in answer to a rule issued by this court to show cause why the motion to dismiss should not be sustained, having admitted the truth of the allegations of fact relied on as ground for dismissal, and it appearing therefrom that the question for decision is moot, the

Writ of error is dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Saffold, Sharpe & Saffold, for plaintiffs. B. P. Jackson and Lankford & Rogers, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'neal v. Hood Coach Lines
175 S.E. 15 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 S.E. 790, 177 Ga. 625, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-darby-ga-1933.