Jones v. Dannenberg Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Jones v. Dannenberg Co.

42 S.E. 65, 115 Ga. 769, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 580

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. Dannenberg Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 L.R.A. 271 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 11, 1902·Published

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

The law of this case was settled at the October term, 1900, of this court. See 112 Ga. 426. It does not appear that at the trial now under review the court below erred in rejecting testimony ; but as there were, in view of the evidence introduced, issues of fact which should have been submitted to and passed upon by the jury, the court erred in directing a verdict.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumpkin, P. J.

The law of this case was settled at the October term, 1900, of this court. See 112 Ga. 426. It does not appear that at the trial now under review the court below erred in rejecting testimony ; but as there were, in view of the evidence introduced, issues of fact which should have been submitted to and passed upon by the jury, the court erred in directing a verdict.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Jones v. Dannenberg Co., 42 S.E. 65, 115 Ga. 769, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 580 (Ga. 1902).

Pincite

42 S.E. 65 (Jones v. Dannenberg Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related