Jones v. Daly Seven, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Jones v. Daly Seven, Inc.

592 F. App'x 226

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2015·No. No. 14-2069·Published

Opinion

[227] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Forrest Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action regarding unfair labor practice charges filed with the National Labor Relations Board. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Daly Seven, Inc., No. 1:12-cv-00510-WO-JLW (M.D.N.C. Sept. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[227] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Forrest Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action regarding unfair labor practice charges filed with the National Labor Relations Board. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Daly Seven, Inc., No. 1:12-cv-00510-WO-JLW (M.D.N.C. Sept. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jones v. Daly Seven, Inc., 592 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

592 F. App'x 226 (Jones v. Daly Seven, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.