Jones v. Dallas Neurological & Spine Associates PA

622 F. App'x 701
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 18, 2015
Docket13-15488
StatusUnpublished

This text of 622 F. App'x 701 (Jones v. Dallas Neurological & Spine Associates PA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Dallas Neurological & Spine Associates PA, 622 F. App'x 701 (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Kathryn and Alan Jones appeal the district court’s dismissal of their declaratory judgment action seeking a tolling of the statute of limitations for a medical malpractice claim they plan to bring. The Joneses have not presented a justiciable case or controversy. See Calderon v. Ashmus, 523 U.S. 740, 747, 118 S.Ct. 1694, 140 L.Ed.2d 970 (1998). It is not clear whether the Joneses will ever bring a medical malpractice claim, or if they do, whether the defendants will raise the statute of limitations as a defense. Until that time, we lack jurisdiction over the claim.

, AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Calderon v. Ashmus
523 U.S. 740 (Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 F. App'x 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-dallas-neurological-spine-associates-pa-ca9-2015.