Jones v. Dallas Neurological & Spine Associates PA
This text of 622 F. App'x 701 (Jones v. Dallas Neurological & Spine Associates PA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Kathryn and Alan Jones appeal the district court’s dismissal of their declaratory judgment action seeking a tolling of the statute of limitations for a medical malpractice claim they plan to bring. The Joneses have not presented a justiciable case or controversy. See Calderon v. Ashmus, 523 U.S. 740, 747, 118 S.Ct. 1694, 140 L.Ed.2d 970 (1998). It is not clear whether the Joneses will ever bring a medical malpractice claim, or if they do, whether the defendants will raise the statute of limitations as a defense. Until that time, we lack jurisdiction over the claim.
, AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
622 F. App'x 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-dallas-neurological-spine-associates-pa-ca9-2015.