Jones v. Cutting

18 P.2d 454, 92 Colo. 123, 1933 Colo. LEXIS 279
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJanuary 7, 1933
DocketNo. 13,157.
StatusPublished

This text of 18 P.2d 454 (Jones v. Cutting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Cutting, 18 P.2d 454, 92 Colo. 123, 1933 Colo. LEXIS 279 (Colo. 1933).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

In a civil action pending in the district court, the court ordered Jones to give Ms deposition before a notary public as upon cross-examination under the statute. He prosecutes error to review the judgment.

The statute referred to is section 6570, C. L. 1921. The facts in essential particulars are similar to those set forth in Taylor v. Briggs Co., 92 Colo. 119, 18 P. (2d) 452, wherein we held that the procedure adopted was unauthorized. The judgment in contempt is accordingly reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to vacate the same, further proceedings, if any, to be not inconsistent with the views herein expressed.

Mr. Justice Campbell and Mr. Justice Alter not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Frank N. Briggs Land Investment Co.
18 P.2d 452 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 P.2d 454, 92 Colo. 123, 1933 Colo. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-cutting-colo-1933.