Jones v. Crowell

S.D. New York

Jones v. Crowell

13 F. Cas. 951, 1854 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 12, 1854·No. Case No. 7,459·Published

Opinion

HELD BY INGERSOLL, District Judge.

That the respondents, having made a tender in the case, admitted themselves to be the owners of the ship. That no misconduct was shown on the part of the libellant which would deprive her of her right to full wages. That, if the libellant had brought suit without good reason, or in such a way as to show an intention to annoy the respondents, costs would be refused: but that no such intention is shown. Decree for libellant, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HELD BY INGERSOLL, District Judge.

That the respondents, having made a tender in the case, admitted themselves to be the owners of the ship. That no misconduct was shown on the part of the libellant which would deprive her of her right to full wages. That, if the libellant had brought suit without good reason, or in such a way as to show an intention to annoy the respondents, costs would be refused: but that no such intention is shown. Decree for libellant, with costs.

Jones v. Crowell, 13 F. Cas. 951, 1854 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55 (S.D.N.Y. 1854).

Pincite

13 F. Cas. 951 (Jones v. Crowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.