Jones v. Crosby
933 So. 2d 542, 2006 WL 42331
This text of 933 So. 2d 542 (Jones v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jones v. Crosby, 933 So. 2d 542, 2006 WL 42331 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
Opinion
Wallace C. JONES, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
James V. CROSBY, Jr., Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Wallace C. Jones, Jr., pro se, petitioner.
No appearance for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Smartt v. First Union National Bank, 771 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)(noting that a motion must be called up for hearing in order to get a ruling).
ERVIN, BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smartt v. First Union National Bank
771 So. 2d 1232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Kusterer v. Kusterer
933 So. 2d 542 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
933 So. 2d 542, 2006 WL 42331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2006.