Jones v. . Craddock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Jones v. . Craddock

190 S.E. 224, 211 N.C. 382, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 95

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 17, 1937

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 S.E. 224 (Jones v. . Craddock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. . Craddock, 190 S.E. 224, 211 N.C. 382, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 95 (N.C. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the verdict is supported by the evidence, there was no error in submitting the issue of contributory negligence to the jury.

The statement on the former appeal, “The contention that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence on her own statement is untenable on this record” (210 N. C., 429, 187 S. E., 558), was hot intended to preclude the submission of the issue to the jury, but had reference to the motion to nonsuit, the only matter then being considered. Hayes v. Tel. Co., ante, 192.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI